The newly elected French President Nicolas Sarkozy has pledged to reform France, make it more competitive, and an important player again in the Global arena.
He will not succeed.
Why not? Because of two reasons.
The first is because, in France, Power is important. Power in the form of Hierarchy (France scores 65 on the dimension “Hierarchy”, of Hofstede’s model of cultural values). This factor shows in Mr. Sarkozy taking the center stage time and again, and wanting to stand in the limelight.
Whilst his counterpart in Germany, Ms. Merkel, is by far more successful in reforming Germany and giving the credit to her team (Germany scores a remarkably low score of 37 on this “Hierarchy” dimension), and not herself.
The second reason why Mr. Sarkozy will not be able to reform France is the relatively high score on the dimension Predictability (France scores 88, UK 36). This makes the French relatively more reluctant to change (or more protective of their own interests) than the British. An example is the removal by Mr. Sarkozy of the EU’s commitment to “undistorted competition” from the draft EU summit declaration recently.
So much for Sarkozy “the reformer“. What he has done will split the EU right down the middle. It’s also an explicit attack by the French president on Gordon Brown’s vision for Europe – which doesn’t augur for European harmony in the months ahead. Apart from anything else, the promotion of competition has brought unmitigated benefits to European consumers, in the form of lower prices for all manner of goods and services.
There would probably be no Ryanair or Easyjet if it weren’t for EU competition policy. There would have been less pressure on mobile phone companies to lower their prices for using phones abroad.
My prediction is that there will be some changes in France, but not the fundamental changes that Mr. Sarkozy has promised during his presidential campaign.
Get a Taste of How Chris Presents, Watch his TEDx Talk
Call Direct: +32476524957
European Office (Paris) Whatsapp: +32476524957
The Americas (USA; Atlanta, GA; también en Español): +1 678 301 8369
Book Chris Smit as a Speaker
If you're looking for an Engaging, Exciting, and Interactive speaker on the subject of Intercultural Management & Awareness you came to the right place.
Chris has spoken at hundreds of events and to thousands of people on the subject of Cultural Diversity & Cultural Competence.
This is What Others Say About Chris:
- “Very Interactive and Engaging”
- “In little time he knew how to get the audience inspired and connected to his story”
- “His ability to make large groups of participants quickly and adequately aware of the huge impact of cultural differences is excellent”
- “Chris is a dedicated and inspirational professional”
In addition, his presentations can cover specific topics cultural topics, or generally on Cultural differences.
Presentations can vary anywhere from 20 minutes to 2 hours and are given worldwide.
Book Chris now by simply sending an email. Click here to do so.
Read more about what Chris can do for you.
- Percentage of People Rating a Presentation as Excellent 86%
- Rating the Presentation as Practical 89%
- Applicability of Chris' presentation 90%
About Peter van der Lende
Peter has joined forces with Culture Matters.
Because he has years and years of international business development experience joining forces therefore only seemed logical.
Being born and raised in the Netherlands, he has lived in more than 9 countries of which most were in Latin America.
He currently lives in Atlanta, Georgia (USA) with his family.
You can find out more at https://expand360.com/
Or find out what Peter can do for you here.
- 183 Chinese American Culture with Ken Wilcox - 19 November 2024
- 182 Living in China with Terence Clarke - 29 October 2024
- Embassies and Cultural Competence - 22 October 2024
Hi Chris
You mean the UK likes change and doesnt care much about protecting its interests?
Isnt the UK the most antagonic country towards Brussels directives and further integration?
Thanks
Hi Paulo,
You’re right in your observation about the UK. But it is not so much about liking change or not. We’re talking about the dimension Anxiety Avoidance here. Also called Uncertainty avoidance (do a search for these terms on this site, and you can read further).
Countries that score low (UK, and Denmark) indeed behave “antagonistic” towards EU legislation from Brussels.
However, these two countries do (!) implement pretty much 100% of what comes out of Brussels.
A country like Greece, which hardly ever opposes anything from Brussels, hardly implements any of the legislation.
Makes some sense?